Training in ABR

What is nHL-to-eHL Correction?

10 mins
01 June 2016

The prefix “nHL” conventionally refers to sound level (dB) of a signal referenced to the thresholds for a group otologically normal hearing people – it is the same concept as dB HL, however nHL is often associated with a short duration signal that has been calibrated using the peak-to-peak equivalent SPL method (via an oscilloscope). Short duration signals are of course used in objective hearing assessment via evoked potentials like ABR, ASSR, AMLR and ALR (as well as other applications like OAE and WBT). eHL is the estimated behavioural hearing level.

Typically, the behavioural hearing threshold is lower than the threshold given by the objective hearing assessment (e.g. ABR, AMLR, ASSR, ALR). Therefore, a correction factor is applied to the objective hearing threshold to better estimate the (all important) behavioural threshold.

Temporal integration is one factor that gives rise to the nHL-to-eHL difference. Temporal integration is the way in which the auditory system integrates energy over time and is particularly relevant for short duration sounds below about 200ms. (This encompasses most sounds used in objective hearing assessment.) However, the pure tones used in behavioural pure tone audiometry are typically much longer than 200ms (e.g. several seconds in duration), so these sounds produce greater temporal integration which acts to increase loudness and lower threshold at an equivalent level (perceptual threshold improves by about -3dB per doubling of sound duration up to 500ms according to the Zwislocki model).  There might be other factors influencing the nHL-to-eHL correction too. For example, the signal presentation rate in the EP recording (which also influences temporal integration, particularly at faster rates), the amount of residual noise in the EP recording, and calibration differences in the ear of the patient. This last feature is of particular relevance when using insert phones amongst infant populations, since the behavioural hearing level is referenced to that of otologically normal adults. Other relevant factors might include the electrode montage, the anatomy of the head and orientation of the neural generators, and arousal (particularly in auditory evoked potentials arising from the cortex).


Michael Maslin
After working for several years as an audiologist in the UK, Michael completed his Ph.D. in 2010 at The University of Manchester. The topic was plasticity of the human binaural auditory system. He then completed a 3-year post-doctoral research program that built directly on the underpinning work carried out during his Ph.D. In 2015, Michael joined the Interacoustics Academy, offering training and education in audiological and vestibular diagnostics worldwide. Michael now works for the University of Canterbury in Christchurch, New Zealand, exploring his research interests which include electrophysiological measurement of the central auditory system, and the development of clinical protocols and clinical techniques applied in areas such as paediatric audiology and vestibular assessment and management.

Popular Academy Advancements

Interacoustics - hearing and balance diagnosis and rehabilitation
Copyright © Interacoustics A/S. All rights reserved.