What is a CM?
The CM (cochlear microphonic) is a response from the cochlea that mimics the input stimulus and is believed to be a response primarily from the outer hair cells (Dallos, 1983).
Why CM?
The presence of a CM along with an absent or abnormal ABR is used in the diagnosis of auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD). When a click ABR or CE-Chirp® perform a CM test. Determining the presence or absence of the CM (OHC response) is an important part of the ANSD test battery.
How to test
Patient Preparation is very important. The patient should be relaxed or sleeping in a quiet environment and lying down during the procedure.
Electrode Placement: It is possible to obtain CM from with a standard ABR electrode montage, however the strongest signal will be obtained with electrodes positioned from a point as close to the site of generation as possible. The most commonly used electrodes for this purpose are the gold foil TipTrodes or TM-trodes. Below are two examples of electrode placements 1) Electrode placement using EPA4 with a TM-trode, and 2) Electrode placement using EPA3 and with a TM-trode.
For both examples the TM-trode and the test ear must be prepared prior to placing the TM-trode on the TM. To reduce impedance a solution of saline can be used. Drain the ear prior to inserting the TM-trode. The TM-trode can be placed in a saline solution for a few minutes prior to placing it on the TM and should be dipped in electrode contact gel (e.g. Sonaville) prior to placing it at the TM.
Example of electrode placement using the TM-trode and EPA4
Example of electrode placement using EPA3 and with a TM-trode electrode
The EPA3 is a simple alternative when only 1-channel is desired and using the TM-trode
Transducer selection: Insert phones must be used, as they allow you to perform a baseline of the recordings. This is done by clamping or pinching the insert phone silicone tubes and then measuring the response. This eliminates the stimuli to the patient’s ears allowing you to distinguish electrical artifacts from a true CM response.
Note the transducers should be placed away from the measurement electrodes and its cables.
Setting up the Eclipse
The Eclipse comes with a pre-programmed protocol for CM testing (license) so the system is ready to use immediately. Protocols can be created or modified easily to fit your clinic needs. Consult your Eclipse Additional Information to learn how to create or modify a protocol. The procedure described below is a guideline for CM testing.
CM test procedure
Choose the protocol Coclear Microphonics CM 
Press
in the toolbar menu to enable A/B (condensation (+) and rarefaction (-)).
Alternatively, if you want to measure one curve as condensation and one curve as rarefaction enter the Temporary Setup prior to starting the test to change the polarity.
Perform a baseline measure with the tube clamped. Make sure not to move the transducer when doing so.
Select ear and intensity and start the measure. Clicks at the intensity level of 80-85dB nHL should be used.
Monitor the EEG during testing to assure a collection with minimal noise.
Monitor the response on the screen in the first few milliseconds – typically 2000 sweeps are conducted when measuring with the A/B enabled using an alternating stimuli – though the number of sweeps should not be used as stop criteria on its own.
If a CM is present it is important to ensure that it is not a stimulus artifact. Make sure that the measure is reproducible and run a measure with the tube clamped.
CM result
Below are two examples of CM responses. The upper is a case of ANSD, while the lower is measured on an individual with normal cochlear microphonic function.

The upper example shows a CM of a baby with ANSD, showing rarefaction, condensation and base line with tube clamped (Stevens et al, 2011).The lower example shows a CM from an infant considered normal.
Patients with ANSD show an abnormal CM, seen as greater than normal amplitude of the response within the first milliseconds. In addition the latency of the CM duration is often longer than expected. Please note that the CM response itself is not sufficient documentation for ANSD and must be supported with an ABR recording to examine if the ABR response is present or absent.
Reporting
Choose the Report Icon 
When complete, choose Save and Exit
References
Dallos P. (1983) Some electrical circuit properties of the organ of Corti. I. Analysis without reactive elements. Hear Res;12:89-120.
Stevens et al. (2011) Guidelines for Cochlear Microphonic Testing, NHS v. 2.0 Edited 2014.
What is ALR / Cortical ERA?
Auditory Late Responses (ALRs) are longer latency components that for most part are generated in higher regions of the auditory CNS, including the auditory cortex. Cortical Evoked Response Audiometry (CERA) refers to the technique of measuring ALRs for the purpose of assessing ones hearing abilities. The responses are typically measured using surface electrodes placed on the scalp of an individual.
Why ALR?
ALR/Cortical ERA is traditionally used to help determine the degree of hearing loss in adult populations. Compared to traditional Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABRs), or behavioral audiometry, ALRs demonstrate audibility at the cortex without the need for the listener to play an active role in the procedure. This is a key advantage in various medico-legal scenarios or in cases where the individual is unable or unwilling to provide accurate behavioral responses to a sound.
Other advantages include the relative robustness of the ALRs to myogenic activity, the high frequency specificity of the tonal stimuli due to their longer duration, and is much closer to the behavioral audiometric pure tone compared to traditional ABR octave wide stimuli, and the ability to calibrate the stimuli according to international standards (BS EN ISO 389 as for pure tone audiometers) and not the standard 389-6 used for Tone burst/Tone pips & Chirps .
The key ALR waveforms observed in CERA are the P1, N1, and P2 responses. The ALR latency typically ranges from 50 – 300 ms and N1-P2 amplitude ranges from 0-20 μV. (see Figure 1, showing P1, N1 and P2 responses to a 2 kHz toneburst stimuli, used to provide a typical threshold recording from the left ear. In this case, hearing sensitivity is shown to be within the normal audiometric range.)

Figure 1 ALR responses Right and Left
How to test
Patient Preparation is very important. Patient arousal and attention state has a significant effect on the amplitudes of the ALR. The ALR waveform changes as a person becomes drowsy or falls asleep. When a patient is asleep the N1 amplitude is smaller and the P2 amplitude is larger. However, when the subject is listening for a change or paying close attention to stimuli the N1 increases in amplitude and in subjects who are not attending to the stimuli, the N1 can become difficult to measure at low intensities (Näätänan and Picton, 1987). The response also habituates quickly, an affect which is more apparent nearer to the threshold of the listener, so it is important to limit the number of stimulus presentations within each ‘run’. Typically, between 15 and 20 presentations might be made per run and a number of successive runs are then merged into a grand average in order to reveal the ALR.
The patient is typically instructed to sit quietly during the procedure, maintaining passive attention for example by reading or watching a close-caption movie with the sound muted. It is not advised to perform ALR and under sedation (Crowley & Colrain, 2004).
Electrode Placement:
It is possible to obtain ALR with a standard 2-channel electrode montage, with an active vertex electrode referenced to either right or left mastoid. However, since the ALR has generators orientated towards the fronto- central regions of the scalp then response strength may be greater when recorded from a point on the midline that is slightly forward of the vertex position.
Setting up the Eclipse
The Eclipse comes with a pre-programmed protocol for ALR testing (license), and is ready for immediate use. Protocols can be created or modified easily to fit your clinic needs. Consult your Eclipse Additional Information to learn how to create or modify a protocol.
Protocol Settings:
In CERA, ALRs should be measured using tone burst (250 Hz – 4 kHz) stimuli at intensity levels between 0 and 100 dB HL to establish threshold.
Summary of parameters for ALR
| P1, N1, P2 | ||
| Subject | State | Awake and quit adults, (and older children) |
| Eyes | Eyes open | |
| Condition | Attend or ignore conditions | |
| Stimuli Recordings | Types of stimuli | Tone burst, speech vowels or consonant vowel combinations |
| Inter-onset interval | 1-2 sec | |
| Stimulus duration | 50 – 80 ms (including 10-15 ms onset/offset ramps) | |
| Presentation | Typically insert or supra-aural headphones | |
| Intensity | Starting at 60-80 dB HL | |
| Recordings | Reference electrode | Right/Left mastoid (optimally linked electrodes using the jumper cable) |
| Filtering | 1-30 Hz | |
| Analysis time | Pre stimuli -100ms Post stimuli 700ms or more |
|
| Sweep | 50-300 [comprised of 10-20 sweep sub averages] | |
| Waveform reproducibility | Set within the latency range 30 –270 ms | |
| Measurements | Adult Children Infants Measures |
P1, N1, P2 P1, N200-250 Reliable components Baseline to peak amplitude, peak latency Use latency window established using grand mean data |
| Response presence | Determined by | Replicable components Response amplitude should be ≥ 2.5 times larger than the residual noise. Residual noise amplitude should be < 1.5 μV (as determined by average difference between replicates) |
Interpretation of the ALR result
Typically the ALR threshold recording is started at 60dB HL and increased or decreased by 20dB based on the response. 5 or 10 dB steps are typically used when close to threshold.
It is recommended that the amplitude of the response is taken as the peak-to-peak amplitude between N1 and P2, and a lower value of 2.5 μV is recommended before a response can be clearly identified. The Waveform Reproducibility function can also be used to indicate the response reliability. This function provides a measure of the correlation between curves held in the A and B buffer when there is a response present.
The residual noise in the trace can be estimated by measuring the ‘average gap’ between replicates (for example, between rarefaction and condensation responses displayed in the A-B buffer).
See Figure 2, which shows the A and B curves separate for each trace. Over the duration of the epoch (-150 ms to + 750 ms) the average gap between traces can be observed to be below 1 μV, and the Waveform Reproducibility for the highlighted curve is shown to be high (73%) indicating reliable response.
Figure 2 ALR showing A&B buffer for repeatability
Electrophysiological Threshold Estimation and correction factors
An ALR threshold at 20dBHL at 2kHz would be considered within the range of normal hearing. Applying a typical correction factor would estimate the behavioral threshold to be 13.5dBHL at 2 kHz.
For masking the ALR, please follow the pure tone audiometry guidance’s.
Lowest level response >5uV: interpolate
Lowest level response <5uV: is threshold
ALR threshold behavioral correction factors to estimated hearing thresholds.
| 500Hz | 1000Hz | 2000Hz | 4000Hz | |
| Stimuli (dB HL) | 50 | 60 | 65 | 65 |
| Mean Correction (dB)* | -6.5 | -6.5 | -6.5 | -6.5 |
| d(B) estimated hearing level eHL | 43.5 | 53.5 | 58.5 | 58.5 |
*Reportings from Liverpool UK, Variance 95% within ±10dB. Note occasionally very poor response > 20dB error
Reporting
Choose the Report Icon![]()
When complete, choose Save and Exit.
References
Crowley, K.E. & Colrain, I.M. (2004) A review of the evidence for P2 being an independent component process: age, sleep and modality. Clin Neurophysiol.(115(4) 732-44.
Näätänen, R. & Picton, T. (1987) The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and an analysis of the component structure. Soc. For Psychophysiological Research, Inc. 24 (4) 375-425.

What is Residual Noise?
What is Fmp?
Benefits of Fmp and Residual Noise
Clinical benefits
References
Don, M. & Elberling, C. (1996). Use of quantitative measures of auditory brain-stem response peak amplitude and residual background noise in the decision to stop averaging. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 99(1).
Elberling, C. & Don, M. (1984). Quality Estimation of averaged auditory brainstem responses. Scand Audiol., (13) 187-197.
What is AMLR?
Auditory Middle-Latency Responses (AMLR) are related to auditory generators of the subcortical regions Na and Pa components at cortical levels. Na is considered the onset of the AMLR and Pa is considered the most robust component of the AMLR.
Why AMLR?
AMLR has the potential to offer a more complete picture of the status of the auditory system and can be used to help determine the degree of hearing loss. The most common neurological use of the AMLR is for the assessment of the functional integrity of the auditory pathway above the level of the brainstem in cases with suspected lesions and for the assessment of nonorganic hearing loss.
Further, AMLR is used in instances of traumatic brain injury, cortical deafness, multiple sclerosis, and cases of central auditory processing disorders.
Young children and infants may not present AMLR even when their auditory and neurological functions are intact, because of their higher sensitivity to stimulus rate. In general AMLR from children younger than 10 years should be interpreted with caution. It is also important to note that prior to the level of interest the auditory function should be examined and working normally, if not this will affect the AMLR results.
The stimuli used for AMLR is similar to the traditional ABR octave wide stimuli.
How to test
Patient Preparation is very important. The patient is instructed to relax and informed about the test procedure prior to testing. AMLR’s are most reliable when the patient is awake and quiet.
During sedation as with natural sleep the ALMR response is not affected.
Electrode Placement:
It is possible to obtain AMLR from with a standard ABR electrode montage. Due to the latency of the AMLR measurement, it is important to pay attention to the PAM muscle artifact, so it is not misinterpreted as an AMLR. To minimize the influence of the PAM muscle, ensure that the patient is calm and relaxed and place the electrodes on the earlobe rather than on the mastoid.

Setting up the Eclipse
The Eclipse comes with a pre-programmed protocol for AMLR testing (license) and is ready to use immediately. Protocols can be created or modified easily to fit your clinic needs. Consult your Eclipse Additional Information to learn how to create or modify a protocol.
Protocol settings:
Interpretation of the AMLR result
The AMLR latency ranges from 15-80 ms and amplitude sizes ranges from 0-2uV.

An AMLR threshold recording here using Tone Burst 1kHz for threshold evaluation.
Cochlear implants
The longer latencies of the AMLR separate them from the cochlear implant stimuli artifacts seen under the traditional eABR. Therefore AMLR’s may be used to assess the efficacy of cochlear implants in activating the auditory pathway.
Reporting
Choose the Report Icon
.
When complete, choose Save and Exit.
References
Atcherson, S.R. & Kennett, S.W. (2013), Applications of middle and late latency responses, ENT & Audiology news (20)4.
Roeser, R.J., Valente, M., Hosford-Dunn, H. (2007). Audiology Diagnosis, Theime 2nded
Several things can influence the results obtained during ABR / ABRIS / ASSR testing. In this guide, some hints for improved recordings will be described. All the suggestions listed below can be applied to the ABR, ABRIS and ASSR module.
1. Preparing the skin
Always use an abrasive preparation gel (e.g., NuPrep) to ensure that the top layer of skin (epidermis) is cleaned and oil is removed. The skin may become a little red after an appropriate preparation, and you should aim to get impedances below 3kOhm.
Note Be careful not to damage the skin.
Neonates Some clinicians use only alcohol wipes/pads to remove vernix prior to ABR recording on neonates (age 0-3 months). A disinfectant agent such as alcohol can also be used for preparing the skin of neonates.
Preparation instructions: Remove any oil/lotion/vernix from the contact point on patient’s head. Wipe all preparation gel off with an alcohol wipe/pad or a soft dry non-stick cloth (e.g., gauze).
2. Mounting the electrodes
Always prepare the skin prior to mounting either disposable or reusable electrodes.
Some disposable electrodes are pre-gelled (e.g., PEG15), and no further gel is required.
Note When mounting pre-gelled disposable electrodes (e.g., PEG15), do not press in the middle of the electrode as gel to be dispersed to the adhesive outer edge causing the electrode to loosen from the skin, causing very high impedances during testing.
Reusable electrodes are expected to have higher impedance than the disposable electrodes.
Lead is sometimes soldered onto the reusable cup electrodes by a hospital to improve their conductivity; producing lower impedances. Reusable electrodes containing lead are not supplied, because of the hazardous nature of lead
1. Test Room Parameters
The test room and location of the room can greatly effect ABR recordings.
The following test room parameters should be aimed for:
In some cases, it may be necessary to find another test location if there is too much ambient or electrical noise in the current test room.
Try moving the test bed within the room. It may be placed unknowingly, adjacent to a wall that has hidden cables and electrical sources.
2. Patient Instructions
The quality of the ABR recordings depends highly on the state of the patient. If the patient is not physically/mentally relaxed, more unstable, noisy recordings will be seen.
Instruct the patient so that:
It is important to try and use the same test conditions and parameters for each test when comparing results.
3. Set an appropriate rejection level
Changing the rejection level
The rejection level should be increased until the real time EEG signal (top of the screen) is no longer red (indicating rejection). The rejection level used will depend on the patient and the electrical interference in the test room. A black EEG curve indicates that the system is ready to measure.

The higher the rejection level value, the more noise is recorded during each average. Therefore, always use the lowest possible rejection level value, without rejection. The level can be adjusted during a recording, by double clicking on the EEG window (EP15/25 only) and adjusting the input level by dragging the horizontal bars.
If a high rejection setting is needed, check that electrode impedances are sufficiently low and that the patient is relaxed before starting the test. Muscle tension of the face, back or neck due an uncomfortable or incorrect position will disturb the ABR recordings as these muscles are close to the recording site.
4. Use of a Ground
Grounding is crucial for good ABR waves and safe operation. A separate ground dedicated for the ABR equipment should be used. A true ground uses a minimum of three earth rods.
The Eclipse’s power cord contains a ground lead (typically indicated by yellow and green colors), but often the ground at the test site may not be sufficient.
Check the ground for proper and correct function
Due to High Voltage, only experienced technicians/ properly trained staff must check and change the ground.
To check and verify the ground, various methods can be used.
1. Optimizing Settings
Changing the filter settings can reduce excessive environmental electrical interference.
With the EP software, go to File - System setup – Auto Protocols tab.
For 15ms tests (ABR-15), change the high pass filter to “100Hz 12/oct”.

Note Using a filter setting like this may reduce the amplitude in the ABR waveforms. However it may be needed if it is impossible to obtain ABR curves without excessive electrical interference.
Change the stimulus rate so that it isn’t time locked to other electrical interference (e.g., 50/60Hz mains) can reduce noise.

For periodic interferences, use the Minimize Interference option. Small random pauses are inserted between stimulus presentations, minimizing the synchronization with electrical interference. These pauses do not influence latency times or in any other manner, change the behavior of ABRs.

Please refer to the Eclipse Additional Information for more information.
2. Use Insert Headphones
The recording below was carried out using reusable electrodes and headphones. Note the very large spikes before 1ms, especially on the curves at high intensities.

This is an electrical artifact caused by electrical coupling from the headphones to the input circuit when high sound stimuli intensities are used.
To solve this:
Prepare the equipment
Test environment
The ideal test environment is a quiet room where lights and other electronic equipment are turned off.
Prepare the Infant
|
Patient state |
The infant should be sleeping or in quiet relaxed state. Sucking, blinking, crying or movement may affect testing. |
|
Skin preparation |
Typically, no skin preparation is required. |
|
Place electrodes |
Place surface electrodes using the desired montage (mastoid or nape).
|
|
Connect cables |
Connect the cables from the PreAmplifier to the respective surface electrodes.
|
Check impedance
At the top of the screen, the impedance is indicated by the green/amber dots on the infant image.

When the dot is amber, this means the impedance is poor (> 40kΩ). In this instance , it may be necessary to clean the skin and/or use some conductive gel and replace the surface electrode.
NB. Testing is possible when impedances are poor. This may, however, affect test time and measurements
Place transducer/s
Place the probe or insert earphones in the infant’s ear/s or place the headset over the infant’s ears.

The probe light will turn green when a good seal is obtained.
Run test
Click on START in the software, press the spacebar or press the preamplifier button.
Patient noise (EEG)
After starting the test, patient noise or EEG is displayed at the top of the screen (depending on setup).

The dark green bars should not reach the black bar

The EEG indicator should remain green
If the patient noise goes above the black line/EEG indicator turns red, try to calm the infant to reduce movement, crying, sucking etc.
If the infant appears calm and the patient noise/EEG is not ideal, stop the test and increase the rejection level using the arrow buttons.
If the patient noise/EEG signal is still not ideal, refer to the EEG troubleshooting section below.
Results
PASS result![]() |
REFER result![]() |
PASS – when the result reaches 100% for the pass criteria, PASS is displayed in green above the measurement.
REFER – when the result does not reach 100% for the pass criteria within the measurement time, REFER is displayed in amber above the measurement.
INCOMPLETE – if the test is stopped before a PASS or REFER is generated by the system, INCOMPLETE is displayed above the measurement indicating that the full test was not completed.
EEG Troubleshooting
When the patient noise/EEG signal is poor and the patient is calm, try the following:
Amplitude Ratio

Amplitude ratio is simply marked with the baseline, the summating potential and the action potential. A ratio between the BSL/SP and BSL/AP is calculated automatically by the system.
Area Ratio
PBSL=Baseline, SP= Summating Potential, AP=Action Potential, BLst=start of baseline, Blend=end of baseline, AP1=start of AP, AP2=end of AP
Area Ratio is marked by first marking the start of the baseline (BLst). The BL end will be marked automatically at the next point in the waveform where the amplitude crosses this baseline. If the waveform does not allow this, you can place the BL end manually. Now mark the SP and the AP1. (the beginning of the AP). Next mark the AP peak. Finally mark the AP2, which is where the AP ends and “changes direction”. A ratio is calculated automatically by the system.
Abnormal SP/AP amplitudes are exceeding a ratio of 0.53 as the critical value. Abnormal SP/AP area ratios are exceeding a ratio of 1.94 as the critical value (Devaiah et al., 2009).
References
Devaiah, A.K., Dawson, K.L., Ferraro, J.A., & Ator, G.A. (2003). Utility of area curve ratio electrocochleography in early meniere disease. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 129, 547-551.
What is Bayesian Weighting?
Bayesian Weighting is a tool designed to assist the clinician when testing in less than optimal conditions. While giving sweeps with less noise a higher “score”, sweeps with more noise are not given the same level of importance in the overall recording. Each sweep is analysed and not simply accepted ot rejected as with traditional averaging but is given a unique signficance based on its level of noise. Baysian Weighting can be used in all typical ABR testing situations and will be effective when EEG levels vary during recording.

When and why to use Bayesian Weighting?
When
Why
When is Bayesian Weighting less Relevant?
If the patient does not have a fluctuating EEG during the session: Bayesian weights noisy sweeps less and quite sweeps more. In a situation where all sweeps are the same, they will be weighted equally. This is identical to normal averaging. Hence, there is no difference between recordings with and without Bayesian.
If a very tough rejection level is set: In this case, all noisy sweeps are simply rejected for both Bayesian and non-Bayesian recordings. Only the most quite sweeps are accepted, and you have a situation almost similar to above. With softer rejection criteria (e.g. 80μV) you would benefit from the contributions of the more noisy sweeps in your averaging thus arriving at your desired residual noise level in less time.
If you run long enough to get a low residual noise level
If two waveforms each have 40nV residual noise, then they will look equally clean. It does not matter whether you have used 1.000 or 10.000 sweeps to get there or what type of weighting is used. Weighting will simply get you there faster if the patient has fluctuating EEG during the session. It should be noted that two waveforms each with 40nV residual noise may exhibit minor variations in wave morphology due to e.g. the frequency distribution of the residual noise. This may differ with different test situations, and quite patients tend to provide residual noise with more high frequency content and less low frequency content, which may look nicer to the eye. So keeping the patient as relaxed as possible is still recommended.
References
Elberling, C. & Wahlgreen (1985). Estimation of auditory brainstem response, ABR, by means of Bayesian interference. Scand. Audiol (14) 89-96.
What is Neuro Latency Protocol?
The default Neuro Latency protocol is designed to evaluate the integrity of the neurologic system. The changes in response latency between the right and left ear at slow stimulation rates are recorded and compared. The Eclipse offers both markers and performs the calculation between the inter-peak Wave I, III & V latencies (between Left and Right). The purpose of the test is to look for retro cochlear pathology.

How does it Work?
The test is run like a traditional ABR. The clinician tests at a high intensity (ex. 80 or even 90dBHL) with a slow rate (i.e. 11.1Hz). The Wave I, III & V for the tracings is marked with the appropriate markers. After they are marked, interaural wave I, III & V and the intra-aural change is calculated.
An interaural difference of maximum 0.3ms is often used as critical value in clinical practice (Stürzebecher et al., 1985; Olsen et al., 1997).
References
Stürzebecher, E. Kevanishvili Z., Webrs, M., Meyer, E., Schmidt, D. (1985). Interpeak intervals of auditory brainstem response, interaural differences in normal-hearing subjects and patients with sensorineural hearing loss. Scand Audiol (14)2 83.
Olsen, W.O., Pratt, T.L., Bauch C.D. (1997). Consistency in latency measurements and interpretation of ABR tracings.American Journal of Audiology, (6)57-62.
Prepare the infant’s skin before placing electrodes (if required). Clean oily skin using alcohol wipes/skin preparation gel. Use a small amount of conductive electrode gel to improve impedances.
Place the surface electrodes (on the prepared skin).
Place the surface electrodes (on the prepared skin).
NB: Ensure the electrode cables are correctly attached to the preamplifier.
Prepare the equipment
Test environment
The ideal test environment is a quiet room where lights and other electronic equipment are turned off.
Prepare the Infant
|
Patient state |
The infant should be sleeping or in quiet relaxed state. Sucking, blinking, crying or movement may affect testing. |
|
Skin preparation |
Typically, no skin preparation is required. |
|
Place electrodes |
Place surface electrodes using the desired montage (mastoid or nape).
|
|
Connect cables |
Connect the cables from the PreAmplifier to the respective surface electrodes.
|
Check impedance
Impedances are indicated by the green/amber dots on the infant as well as in numerical format on screen.

When the dot is amber, this means the impedance is poor (> 40kΩ). In this instance, it may be necessary to clean the skin and replace the surface electrode.
NB. Testing is possible when impedances are poor. This may, however, affect test time and measurements.
Place transducer/s
Place the probe or insert earphones in the infant’s ear/s or place the headset over the infant’s ears.

The probe light will turn green when a good seal is obtained.
Run test
Press the START button on the Titan or press the preamplifier button.
Patient noise (EEG)
After starting the test, the patient noise/EEG bar is displayed at the top of the screen.

If the patient noise goes above the black line, try to calm the infant to reduce movement, crying, sucking etc.
If the infant appears calm and the patient noise is not ideal, stop the test and select a protocol with a higher rejection level (if available).
If the patient noise/EEG signal is still not ideal, refer to the EEG troubleshooting section below.
Results
PASS result![]() |
REFER result![]() |
PASS – when the result reaches 100% for the pass criteria, PASS is displayed in green above the measurement.
REFER – when the result does not reach 100% for the pass criteria within the measurement time, REFER is displayed in amber above the measurement.
INCOMPLETE – if the test is stopped before a PASS or REFER is generated by the system, INCOMPLETE is displayed above the measurement indicating that the full test was not completed.
EEG troubleshooting
When the patient noise/EEG signal is poor and the patient is calm, try the following:
![]() |
||
| Forehead | Right mastoid | Left mastoid |
![]() |
||
| Forehead | Right mastoid | Left mastoid |

